Most traders who fail a $50K evaluation do not fail because their strategy stopped working. They fail because they never wrote down how much a single trade was allowed to cost, so the account's rules made that decision for them, on the worst possible day. A risk plan is the document that makes the decision in advance. This one takes about twenty minutes to build and uses nothing but the numbers on the plan card.
We will build it twice: once for a $50K futures evaluation with a trailing drawdown and no daily loss limit (our Bold plan), and once for a $50K forex evaluation with a static drawdown and a daily loss limit (our Two-Step plan). The method is the same for any firm; only the inputs change.
Step 1: write down the four numbers that matter
Before anything else, copy these from the plan card for the exact size you intend to buy. Not from a YouTube review, not from memory.
| Input | $50K Bold (futures) | $50K Two-Step (forex) |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | $3,000 | $4,000 (phase 1), $2,500 (phase 2) |
| Maximum drawdown | $2,000, end-of-day trailing, locks at $50,100 | $5,000 (10%), static |
| Daily loss limit | None | $2,500 (5%) |
| Other constraints | 40% consistency at pass, no minimum days, 5 minis / 50 micros | No minimum days, 1:100 leverage |
Notice the shape of the two accounts. Bold gives you less total room ($2,000) but no daily rule and a floor that locks once you are $2,100 up. Two-Step gives you more room ($5,000) but adds a daily rule that can end the account in one session. Neither is "easier"; they punish different mistakes. If you are not sure which drawdown type suits you, read static vs trailing drawdown first.
Step 2: choose risk per trade from the drawdown, not from the balance
The most common sizing error is risking a percentage of the $50,000. The $50,000 is not yours to lose. The number you are actually trading with is the drawdown, so size from that.
A workable default is 10% of the maximum drawdown per trade. That gives you ten consecutive full-stop losses before a breach, which is enough runway for a real strategy to have a real bad streak without ending the account.
- Bold: 10% of $2,000 = $200 per trade.
- Two-Step: 10% of $5,000 = $500 per trade. That is 1% of balance, which is aggressive for forex; most traders will prefer $250 (0.5%), giving twenty losers of runway.
Then translate the dollar risk into contracts or lots. On Bold, $200 of risk with a 10-point stop on MES ($5 a point) is four micro contracts; with an 8-point stop on MNQ ($2 a point) it is twelve micros. On Two-Step, $250 of risk with a 25-pip stop on EUR/USD is one standard lot ($10 a pip). The contract or lot size is an output of the stop distance, never an input.
Rule
If a setup needs a stop wider than your plan allows at minimum size, you do not take a smaller stop. You skip the trade.
Step 3: set a daily stop even when the firm does not
Bold has no daily loss limit. Traders read that as freedom. It is actually the transfer of a responsibility from the firm to you. Without a daily stop, the only thing between a bad morning and a $2,000 breach is your mood at 10:45.
Set your own: three full losses. On Bold that is $600, 30% of the drawdown. On Two-Step it is $750, less than a third of the firm's $2,500 daily limit, which means you can have a bad day without the firm's rule ever coming into play. When you hit it, you close the platform. Not "one more to get it back". Closed.
Three is not magic, but it is the number at which most traders can still tell the difference between a bad day and a broken process. After four or five losses in a row, almost nobody can.
Step 4: work out how many trades the target really takes
This is the step that removes the pressure. Traders rush evaluations because they have never calculated how long a pass should take, so every losing day feels like falling behind.
Assume a modest, honest edge: 45% win rate, winners of 2R, losers of 1R. Expectancy is 0.45 × 2 − 0.55 × 1 = 0.35R per trade.
| $50K Bold | $50K Two-Step (phase 1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Risk per trade (1R) | $200 | $250 |
| Target in R | 15R | 16R |
| Trades to target at 0.35R | ~43 | ~46 |
| Trades per day (plan) | 3 | 3 |
| Trading days to pass (average) | ~14 | ~15 |
| Worst realistic streak at this edge | 7–8 losers | 7–8 losers |
| Losers to breach at 1R | 10 | 20 |
Two things fall out of the table. First, an honest edge passes a $50K evaluation in about three trading weeks at three trades a day. There is no time limit on any of our plans, so the calendar cannot hurt you; only the drawdown can. Second, the worst streak a 45% system produces in a 50-trade sample is around seven or eight consecutive losses, which sits inside the ten-loser runway on Bold and well inside the twenty on Two-Step. The plan survives its own bad luck. That is the whole point of it.
If your real win rate is lower or your winners are smaller, redo the maths with your numbers. If the trades-to-target figure comes out above 100, the problem is the strategy, not the evaluation.
Step 5: plan for the consistency rule before it plans for you
The Bold evaluation has a 40% consistency rule at the moment you pass: no single day may be more than 40% of your total profit. With a $3,000 target, that caps your best day at $1,200. A trader who makes $1,800 on day one has not broken anything, but they have created a job for themselves: they now need $4,500 of total profit before that day is within the limit, so the pass takes longer.
The practical version of the rule is simple: once a day is up around 4R ($800 on Bold), stop. You are not leaving money on the table; you are keeping the target reachable. Two-Step has no consistency rule at all, so a big day there is just a big day. The full mechanics, with a calculator table, are in the consistency rule explained.
Step 6: know exactly where the floor is, every day
On a static account the floor never moves: $45,000 on Two-Step, and the daily line resets to $2,500 below each day's opening balance. On Bold the floor trails your highest end-of-day balance by $2,000 until it locks. Close Monday at $51,000 and Tuesday's floor is $49,000. It never goes back down.
Write the floor in your journal every morning before the first trade. Our dashboard shows the live distance to the floor, but the habit matters more than the widget: a trader who knows the number does not need to feel it.
The lock is worth aiming for on Bold. Once an end-of-day balance reaches $52,100, the floor freezes at $50,100 for good and the account behaves like a static one from then on. That is $2,100 of profit, or about 10R at $200. It is not a target the firm sets, but it is the point at which the evaluation stops being able to surprise you.
The one-page plan
Here is the whole thing, filled in for Bold. Copy it, change the inputs, and keep it open while you trade.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Account | $50K Bold, $2,000 EOD trailing, no daily limit |
| Risk per trade | $200 (10% of drawdown) |
| Stop → size | MES 10 pts = 4 micros; MNQ 8 pts = 12 micros; never more than the plan's 50-micro cap |
| Daily stop (mine) | 3 losses / $600, then close the platform |
| Daily cap (mine) | +$800, protects the 40% consistency rule |
| Target | $3,000 = 15R; expected ~43 trades / ~14 days |
| Floor today | Written down before the first trade |
| Lock level | $52,100 end-of-day; floor freezes at $50,100 |
| Skip rule | Stop wider than plan at minimum size = no trade |
Three things the plan does not fix
It does not fix a strategy with no edge; it only tells you sooner. It does not stop you from overriding it; that is what the daily stop and the closed platform are for. And it does not remove losses. A $50K evaluation with a written plan still has losing days; it just has them at a size the account can absorb.
Every rule referenced here is on the plan card for the size you pick, with a plain-English explanation next to it, and the complete set is in every Bold Funded rule explained. Read the card, build the plan, then trade small until the floor has moved with your own eyes.
Every number in this post comes from the plan cards. Choose Bold or Two-Step at $50K and the drawdown, daily limit and target are printed for you.
Pick a $50K plan and see its exact limitsFrequently asked questions
How much should I risk per trade in a prop firm evaluation?
A workable default is 10% of your maximum drawdown per trade, which gives you ten consecutive losers before a breach. On a $50K Bold account with a $2,000 trailing drawdown that is $200 a trade; on a $50K Two-Step with a $5,000 static drawdown it is $500, though 0.5% ($250) is the more common choice.
How many trades does it take to pass a $50K evaluation?
It depends on your edge, not the firm. With a 45% win rate and 2R winners, expectancy is about 0.35R per trade, so a $3,000 target at $200 risk (15R) takes roughly 43 trades on average, and a $4,000 target at $250 risk (16R) roughly 46.
Should I set my own daily loss limit if the firm has none?
Yes. Bold and Bolt have no daily loss limit, which means the only thing stopping a bad day from becoming a breach is you. Three losing trades is a sensible daily stop; it keeps a bad day at 30% of your total drawdown.
Does a bigger account size make the evaluation easier?
No. Targets and drawdowns scale with the account, so the maths is the same. What changes is the fee and the temptation to size up. Pass the size you can afford to reset.